SURESH RAMA PAWAR vs DIGAMBAR VITHAL BHOSALE AND OTHERS — CA/5186/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030174122026

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

CA/12947/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CA/5186/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH RAMA PAWAR

    Adv. KULDEEP SUBHASHRAO PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIGAMBAR VITHAL BHOSALE AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SAVITABAI DIGAMBAR BHOSALE

  3. 3.NAGNATH DIGAMBAR BHOSALE

  4. 4.ABA DIGAMBAR BHOSALE

  5. 5.PRABHAVATIBAI MAROTI DHUMAL

  6. 6.ARVIND MAROTI DHUMAL

  7. 7.SUREKHA MAROTI DHUMAL

  8. 8.TILOTTAMA SURESH PAWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted interim protection to applicant Suresh Rama Pawar in his second appeal against the reversal of a trial court's decree by the appellate court. The trial court had granted an injunction restraining defendants from obstructing Pawar's possession of land (Survey No. 40/A) in Latur district and his half-share in a well, based on a 1986 agreement to sell executed by deceased Maroti. The court ordered status quo regarding possession and nature of the property pending next hearing on 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Urgent Orders (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5186/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted interim protection to applicant Suresh Rama Pawar in his second appeal against the reversal of a trial court's decree by the appellate court. The trial court had granted an injunction restraining defendants from obstructing Pawar's possession of land (Survey No. 40/A) in Latur district and his half-share in a well, based on a 1986 agreement to sell executed by deceased Maroti. The court ordered status quo regarding possession and nature of the property pending next hearing on 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case