SURESH RAMA PAWAR vs DIGAMBAR VITHAL BHOSALE AND OTHERS — CA/5186/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 30th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030174122026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

CA/12947/2026

Filing Date

29-04-2026

Registration No

CA/5186/2026

Registration Date

29-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

SURESH RAMA PAWAR

Adv. KULDEEP SUBHASHRAO PATIL

Respondent(s)

DIGAMBAR VITHAL BHOSALE AND OTHERS

SAVITABAI DIGAMBAR BHOSALE

NAGNATH DIGAMBAR BHOSALE

ABA DIGAMBAR BHOSALE

PRABHAVATIBAI MAROTI DHUMAL

ARVIND MAROTI DHUMAL

SUREKHA MAROTI DHUMAL

TILOTTAMA SURESH PAWAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

30-04-2026

URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted interim protection to applicant Suresh Rama Pawar in his second appeal against the reversal of a trial court's decree by the appellate court. The trial court had granted an injunction restraining defendants from obstructing Pawar's possession of land (Survey No. 40/A) in Latur district and his half-share in a well, based on a 1986 agreement to sell executed by deceased Maroti. The court ordered status quo regarding possession and nature of the property pending next hearing on 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted interim protection to applicant Suresh Rama Pawar in his second appeal against the reversal of a trial court's decree by the appellate court. The trial court had granted an injunction restraining defendants from obstructing Pawar's possession of land (Survey No. 40/A) in Latur district and his half-share in a well, based on a 1986 agreement to sell executed by deceased Maroti. The court ordered status quo regarding possession and nature of the property pending next hearing on 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case