FIRDOZ SHIRIN AZHAR AHMED DESHMUKH vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/5536/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030173932025

Filing Number

WP/13277/2025

Filing Date

24-Apr-2025

Registration No

WP/5536/2025

Registration Date

24-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
Mamlatdar Court Act 1906

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FIRDOZ SHIRIN AZHAR AHMED DESHMUKH

    Adv. BIRADAR RAMRAO DHONDIRAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

    Adv. RODGE KRISHNA PRATAP AND RODGE PRATAP FOR R/5,AGP FOR R.NOS. 1 TO 4 (WAIVES) 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 5536/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) held that a 2021 Mamlatdar's injunction order regarding a customary way through the petitioner's land cannot be enforced against her because she was neither made a party to nor given notice of the original proceeding. The Court ruled the order's operation is limited to original parties only, and any claim for right-of-way against the petitioner requires a fresh proceeding; no coercive action can be taken based on the impugned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  5. 05-May-2026

    Urgent Circulation - CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    For Orders Unserved Notice CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  7. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  11. 22-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

  12. 22-Dec-2025

    For Orders Unserved Notice CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  13. 22-Dec-2025

    For Orders Unserved Notice CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

  15. 24-Sep-2025

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  16. 13-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  17. 13-Aug-2025

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  18. 30-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  19. 02-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  20. 20-Jun-2025

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  21. 25-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF

  22. 25-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 24-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5536/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 5536/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) held that a 2021 Mamlatdar's injunction order regarding a customary way through the petitioner's land cannot be enforced against her because she was neither made a party to nor given notice of the original proceeding. The Court ruled the order's operation is limited to original parties only, and any claim for right-of-way against the petitioner requires a fresh proceeding; no coercive action can be taken based on the impugned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case