DATTA VISHNU GONGANE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/583/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030173642026
e-Filing Number
22-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/4434/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/583/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DATTA VISHNU GONGANE
Adv. Rupesh Anil Jaiswal
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
-
2.DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS
-
3.INSPECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
-
15-Jun-2026
Urgent Circulation-Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
Case Summary: Petitioner Datta Vishnu Gongane challenged rejection of his parole leave sought due to his mother's medical condition (prolapse uterus requiring surgery). The court found conflicting medical opinions on urgency and directed the Civil Surgeon, Parbhani to examine the mother and submit a report by 15/05/2026. The petition was adjourned pending the medical examination; liberty granted to mention the matter during vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/583/2026
Case Summary: Petitioner Datta Vishnu Gongane challenged rejection of his parole leave sought due to his mother's medical condition (prolapse uterus requiring surgery). The court found conflicting medical opinions on urgency and directed the Civil Surgeon, Parbhani to examine the mother and submit a report by 15/05/2026. The petition was adjourned pending the medical examination; liberty granted to mention the matter during vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts