GUNDU RAGHUNATH GAIKWAD SAnTOSH N.PATNE vs THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT STRENGHTING MAJBUTIKARAN DIVISION OMERGA — CA/5266/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 466. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030173392026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/12912/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
CA/5266/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GUNDU RAGHUNATH GAIKWAD SAnTOSH N.PATNE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT STRENGHTING MAJBUTIKARAN DIVISION OMERGA
-
2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD
-
3.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KRISHNA KHORE DEVELOPMENT MAHAMANDAL OMERGA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed Gundu Raghunath Gaikwad's application seeking withdrawal of land acquisition compensation deposited by the acquiring body. The court permitted withdrawal of 75% of the deposited amount, recognizing the applicant's status as an agriculturist, while the acquiring body's appeal against the Reference Court award remains pending; withdrawal is conditional on undertaking to refund the amount with interest if the appeal succeeds against the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
CIVIL Application For Withdrawal Of Amount- CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/5266/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed Gundu Raghunath Gaikwad's application seeking withdrawal of land acquisition compensation deposited by the acquiring body. The court permitted withdrawal of 75% of the deposited amount, recognizing the applicant's status as an agriculturist, while the acquiring body's appeal against the Reference Court award remains pending; withdrawal is conditional on undertaking to refund the amount with interest if the appeal succeeds against the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts