VIPUL S/O. SAKHARAM BANKAR ADV, ,HARSHAL PRAKASH RANDHIR,HARSHAL PRAKASH RANDHIR FOR PETITIONER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — WP/807/2020
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--RULE DISCHARGED on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030173222020
Filing Number
WP/807/2020
Filing Date
07-Aug-2020
Registration No
WP/807/2020
Registration Date
07-Aug-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF PROSECUTION/FIR ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--RULE DISCHARGED
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIPUL S/O. SAKHARAM BANKAR ADV, ,HARSHAL PRAKASH RANDHIR,HARSHAL PRAKASH RANDHIR FOR PETITIONER
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the trial court's rejection of his application under Section 311 CrPC to recall the victim (PW-5) for further cross-examination in a POCSO case. The court held that the petitioner failed to specify what important questions remained unasked or demonstrate that recalling the witness was essential for a just decision, and found no substantial grounds to interfere with the trial court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
27-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
18-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
04-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
14-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
14-Jan-2026
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
-
17-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF
-
17-Dec-2025
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
-
19-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF
-
19-Dec-2023
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
03-Nov-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
03-Nov-2023
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
05-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
05-Oct-2023
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
21-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
21-Sep-2023
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
12-Sep-2023
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
29-Aug-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
29-Aug-2023
For Dismissal [Criminal Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
17-Aug-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
17-Aug-2023
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
18-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
18-Jul-2023
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
27-Jun-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
27-Jun-2023
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
18-Apr-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
18-Apr-2023
Urgent Circulation-Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
18-Aug-2020
Notification
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni
-
10-Aug-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni
-
10-Aug-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni
-
10-Aug-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Aug-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WP/807/2020
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the trial court's rejection of his application under Section 311 CrPC to recall the victim (PW-5) for further cross-examination in a POCSO case. The court held that the petitioner failed to specify what important questions remained unasked or demonstrate that recalling the witness was essential for a just decision, and found no substantial grounds to interfere with the trial court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts