1 KRISHNA HIRAMAN PATIL AJEET BABANRAO KALE vs 1 THE COLLECTOR JALGAON — CA/5326/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 157. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030172932026
e-Filing Number
25-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/12877/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
CA/5326/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.1 KRISHNA HIRAMAN PATIL AJEET BABANRAO KALE
-
2.2 MUKTABAI HIRAMAN PATIL
Adv. AJEET BABANRAO KALE
Respondent(s)
-
1.1 THE COLLECTOR JALGAON
-
2.2 THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER UPPER TAPI PROJECT HATNUR
-
3.3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER GIRNA KALVA NUTANIRAKAN VIBHAG
-
4.4 THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER TAPI VIKAS MAHAMANDAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the applicants' civil applications seeking withdrawal of land acquisition compensation deposits. The court permitted 75% withdrawal upon furnishing an undertaking and the remaining 25% upon providing solvent surety/security to the Court's Registrar. The court also condoned delays in preferring first appeals, finding no mala fides, and admitted the appeals for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
At 2.30 Pm CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/5326/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the applicants' civil applications seeking withdrawal of land acquisition compensation deposits. The court permitted 75% withdrawal upon furnishing an undertaking and the remaining 25% upon providing solvent surety/security to the Court's Registrar. The court also condoned delays in preferring first appeals, finding no mala fides, and admitted the appeals for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts