DIGAMBAR GOVINDA PATIL AJEET BABANRAO KALE vs 1 THE COLLECTOR JALGAON — CA/5352/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 157. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030172702026
e-Filing Number
25-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/12860/2026
Filing Date
28-04-2026
Registration No
CA/5352/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIGAMBAR GOVINDA PATIL AJEET BABANRAO KALE
Respondent(s)
1 THE COLLECTOR JALGAON
2 THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER UPPER TAPI PROJECT HATNUR JALGAON
3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER GIRNA KALVA NUTANUKARAN VIBHG
4 THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER TAPI VIKAS MAHAMANDAL JALGAON
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CA 5352/2026 (Digambar Govinda Patil v. Collector Jalgaon) The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the applicants' civil applications seeking withdrawal of deposited amounts in a land acquisition matter. The court permitted disbursement of 75% of the deposit upon furnishing an undertaking, with the remaining 25% subject to solvent surety/security approval by the Registrar. The court also condoned delays in preferring first appeals, finding no mala fides, and admitted the first appeals for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CA 5352/2026 (Digambar Govinda Patil v. Collector Jalgaon) The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the applicants' civil applications seeking withdrawal of deposited amounts in a land acquisition matter. The court permitted disbursement of 75% of the deposit upon furnishing an undertaking, with the remaining 25% subject to solvent surety/security approval by the Registrar. The court also condoned delays in preferring first appeals, finding no mala fides, and admitted the first appeals for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts