GURUNATH NAGNATH BARGILE ADV NAMDEV D KENDRE vs The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division — CA/5323/2026

Disposed: --PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030171892026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

CA/12797/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

CA/5323/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURUNATH NAGNATH BARGILE ADV NAMDEV D KENDRE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division

  2. 2.The State of Maharashtra Through the Collector

  3. 3.The Sub Divisional Officer LNQ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad partly allowed the civil applications filed by claimants seeking withdrawal of amounts deposited by the acquiring body (Minor Irrigation Division). The court found that the acquiring body had deposited less than 50% of the required amount with accrued interest, contrary to obligations, and permitted claimants to withdraw the deposited amounts with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar. The acquiring body was directed to comply with earlier court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5323/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad partly allowed the civil applications filed by claimants seeking withdrawal of amounts deposited by the acquiring body (Minor Irrigation Division). The court found that the acquiring body had deposited less than 50% of the required amount with accrued interest, contrary to obligations, and permitted claimants to withdraw the deposited amounts with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar. The acquiring body was directed to comply with earlier court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case