GAJENDRA MANOHAR CHAVAN ALIAS GAJENDRA BHAUSAHEB CHAVAN vs BAINABAI BHAUSAHEB CHAVAN — WP/5024/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030171802026

Filing Number

WP/12789/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5024/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAJENDRA MANOHAR CHAVAN ALIAS GAJENDRA BHAUSAHEB CHAVAN

    Adv. MADDE SHRIKANT B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAINABAI BHAUSAHEB CHAVAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Gajendra Chavan challenging the District Judge's refusal to frame additional issues in his appeal of a partition suit. The petitioner had sought to raise issues challenging the validity of the respondent's marriage under Hindu Marriage Act Section 5, but the court held that such issues cannot be raised at the appellate stage when the defendant's own written statement had admitted the respondent as a lawful wife and claimed she surrendered her share—contradicting the new allegations. The court upheld the appellate court's imposition of Rs. 30,000 costs based on the petitioner's conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5024/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Gajendra Chavan challenging the District Judge's refusal to frame additional issues in his appeal of a partition suit. The petitioner had sought to raise issues challenging the validity of the respondent's marriage under Hindu Marriage Act Section 5, but the court held that such issues cannot be raised at the appellate stage when the defendant's own written statement had admitted the respondent as a lawful wife and claimed she surrendered her share—contradicting the new allegations. The court upheld the appellate court's imposition of Rs. 30,000 costs based on the petitioner's conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case