Dnyneshvar Maharu Vanjari and Others ADV. PRAFULLASING H PATIL vs The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Jalgaon and Others — CA/5225/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 55. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030171702026
e-Filing Number
20-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/12780/2026
Filing Date
28-04-2026
Registration No
CA/5225/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dnyneshvar Maharu Vanjari and Others ADV. PRAFULLASING H PATIL
Sumanbai Zaga Vanjari
Sonabai alias Shanubai Gajendra Vanjari
Sagunabai Maharu Vanjari
Sangitabai Maharu Vanjari alias Sangita Sudam Pawar
Respondent(s)
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Jalgaon and Others
The Executive Director Tapi Pathbandare Vikas Mahamandal
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CA/5225/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the applicants' plea to withdraw Rs. 28,62,871/- deposited by the acquiring body, permitting them to receive 75% of the deposited amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial). The remaining 25% was directed to be invested in a nationalized bank. The court found that since the land enhancement exceeded four times the original assessment, partial withdrawal in the applicants' favor was in the interest of justice. The court also condoned a 2086-day delay in preferring the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CA/5225/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the applicants' plea to withdraw Rs. 28,62,871/- deposited by the acquiring body, permitting them to receive 75% of the deposited amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial). The remaining 25% was directed to be invested in a nationalized bank. The court found that since the land enhancement exceeded four times the original assessment, partial withdrawal in the applicants' favor was in the interest of justice. The court also condoned a 2086-day delay in preferring the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts