Dnyneshvar Maharu Vanjari and Others ADV. PRAFULLASING H PATIL vs The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Jalgaon and Others — CA/5225/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 55. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030171702026

e-Filing Number

20-04-2026

Filing Number

CA/12780/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

CA/5225/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 55

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dnyneshvar Maharu Vanjari and Others ADV. PRAFULLASING H PATIL

  2. 2.Sumanbai Zaga Vanjari

  3. 3.Sonabai alias Shanubai Gajendra Vanjari

  4. 4.Sagunabai Maharu Vanjari

  5. 5.Sangitabai Maharu Vanjari alias Sangita Sudam Pawar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Jalgaon and Others

  2. 2.The Executive Director Tapi Pathbandare Vikas Mahamandal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    Case Summary: CA/5225/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the applicants' plea to withdraw Rs. 28,62,871/- deposited by the acquiring body, permitting them to receive 75% of the deposited amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial). The remaining 25% was directed to be invested in a nationalized bank. The court found that since the land enhancement exceeded four times the original assessment, partial withdrawal in the applicants' favor was in the interest of justice. The court also condoned a 2086-day delay in preferring the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    At 2.30 Pm CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5225/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/5225/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the applicants' plea to withdraw Rs. 28,62,871/- deposited by the acquiring body, permitting them to receive 75% of the deposited amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial). The remaining 25% was directed to be invested in a nationalized bank. The court found that since the land enhancement exceeded four times the original assessment, partial withdrawal in the applicants' favor was in the interest of justice. The court also condoned a 2086-day delay in preferring the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case