VITTHAL GANPATI KAILWADE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/4899/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030171572026
Filing Number
WP/12770/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/4899/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VITTHAL GANPATI KAILWADE
Adv. SUNKEWAR OMPRAKASH SAYANNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS
-
2.SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE KINWAT
-
3.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
-
4.THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide petitioner Vitthal Ganpati Kailwade's claim of belonging to the 'Koli Mahadev' scheduled tribe within four months, noting the claim had been pending for 15 years since October 2011 and the petitioner is in public employment. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4899/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide petitioner Vitthal Ganpati Kailwade's claim of belonging to the 'Koli Mahadev' scheduled tribe within four months, noting the claim had been pending for 15 years since October 2011 and the petitioner is in public employment. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts