VITTHAL GANPATI KAILWADE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/4899/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030171572026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/12770/2026

Filing Date

28-04-2026

Registration No

WP/4899/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

VITTHAL GANPATI KAILWADE

Adv. SUNKEWAR OMPRAKASH SAYANNA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS

SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE KINWAT

THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

04-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide petitioner Vitthal Ganpati Kailwade's claim of belonging to the 'Koli Mahadev' scheduled tribe within four months, noting the claim had been pending for 15 years since October 2011 and the petitioner is in public employment. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide petitioner Vitthal Ganpati Kailwade's claim of belonging to the 'Koli Mahadev' scheduled tribe within four months, noting the claim had been pending for 15 years since October 2011 and the petitioner is in public employment. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case