MADHUKAR APPARAO KORALE vs THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT STRENGHTING MAJBUTIKARAN DIVISION OMERGA — CA/5270/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030171532026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

28-04-2026

Filing Number

CA/12768/2026

Filing Date

28-04-2026

Registration No

CA/5270/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

MADHUKAR APPARAO KORALE

Adv. Patne Santosh N.

Respondent(s)

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT STRENGHTING MAJBUTIKARAN DIVISION OMERGA

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KRISHNA KHORE DEVELOPMENT MAHAMANDAL OMERGA

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the withdrawal application filed by Madhukar Apparao Korale and others regarding land acquired in 2004 for an irrigation project. The court permitted the applicants—agriculturists—to withdraw 75% of the deposited amount on the condition that they file an undertaking to refund the withdrawn amount with interest if the acquiring body's pending appeal against the Reference Court's award is decided in its favor. The court balanced the financial hardship of the applicants against the pendency of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the withdrawal application filed by Madhukar Apparao Korale and others regarding land acquired in 2004 for an irrigation project. The court permitted the applicants—agriculturists—to withdraw 75% of the deposited amount on the condition that they file an undertaking to refund the withdrawn amount with interest if the acquiring body's pending appeal against the Reference Court's award is decided in its favor. The court balanced the financial hardship of the applicants against the pendency of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case