SAINATH RAMKISHAN GUDALOD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/4985/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030171212026
Filing Number
WP/12750/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/4985/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAINATH RAMKISHAN GUDALOD
Adv. SUNIL MAHADEVAPPA VIBHUTE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS
-
2.THE SCHEDULE TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, KINWAT
-
3.THE COLLECTOR PALGHAR
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jun-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 30.06.2026 in Sainath Ramkishan Gudalod's writ petition challenging an impugned order. Pending hearing, the court restrained Respondent No. 3 (Collector Palghar) from taking coercive action, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits (promotion, increment, pay fixation, confirmation) until the petition is decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4985/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 30.06.2026 in Sainath Ramkishan Gudalod's writ petition challenging an impugned order. Pending hearing, the court restrained Respondent No. 3 (Collector Palghar) from taking coercive action, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits (promotion, increment, pay fixation, confirmation) until the petition is decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts