SAINATH RAMKISHAN GUDALOD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/4985/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030171212026

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/12750/2026

Filing Date

28-04-2026

Registration No

WP/4985/2026

Registration Date

04-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

SAINATH RAMKISHAN GUDALOD

Adv. SUNIL MAHADEVAPPA VIBHUTE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS

THE SCHEDULE TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, KINWAT

THE COLLECTOR PALGHAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

05-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

30-06-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 30.06.2026 in Sainath Ramkishan Gudalod's writ petition challenging an impugned order. Pending hearing, the court restrained Respondent No. 3 (Collector Palghar) from taking coercive action, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits (promotion, increment, pay fixation, confirmation) until the petition is decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 30.06.2026 in Sainath Ramkishan Gudalod's writ petition challenging an impugned order. Pending hearing, the court restrained Respondent No. 3 (Collector Palghar) from taking coercive action, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits (promotion, increment, pay fixation, confirmation) until the petition is decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Caste Claim - St All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case