ARUSH SHIRISH TAWAR MINOR THR FATHER SHIRISH TAWAR R K MENDADKAR AND VIJAY GANGALWAD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR — WP/5031/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030169872026
Filing Number
WP/12627/2026
Filing Date
27-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5031/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARUSH SHIRISH TAWAR MINOR THR FATHER SHIRISH TAWAR R K MENDADKAR AND VIJAY GANGALWAD
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad directed the State's Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's claim of belonging to "Tokre Koli" Scheduled Tribe, which had been pending since January 27, 2025. Considering the petitioner's intention to pursue higher studies, the court set a preferential deadline of four months for the committee to resolve the tribe claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad directed the State's Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's claim of belonging to "Tokre Koli" Scheduled Tribe, which had been pending since January 27, 2025. Considering the petitioner's intention to pursue higher studies, the court set a preferential deadline of four months for the committee to resolve the tribe claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts