RATNADEEP NAMDEO GOKHALE vs POOJA RATNADEEP GOKHALE — WP/5023/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030169002026

Filing Number

WP/12555/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5023/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Hindu Marriage Act 1955

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RATNADEEP NAMDEO GOKHALE

    Adv. PATIL SACHIN HAIBATRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.POOJA RATNADEEP GOKHALE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court at Aurangabad rejected the writ petition challenging the lower court's interim maintenance order. The trial court had granted Rs.8,000 per month maintenance to the respondent wife (who maintains two children aged 5 and 3 years) after estimating the petitioner's income at Rs.25,000 monthly from agricultural land, pension, house rent, and savings, despite his claim of no income source. The High Court found the maintenance assessment reasonable and not excessive, dismissing the petition as meritless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5023/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Aurangabad rejected the writ petition challenging the lower court's interim maintenance order. The trial court had granted Rs.8,000 per month maintenance to the respondent wife (who maintains two children aged 5 and 3 years) after estimating the petitioner's income at Rs.25,000 monthly from agricultural land, pension, house rent, and savings, despite his claim of no income source. The High Court found the maintenance assessment reasonable and not excessive, dismissing the petition as meritless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case