BHIMRAO BHAGAJI TAYADE DEEPAK D CHOUDHARI AND RAMESH B MORE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5149/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030168652026

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/12521/2026

Filing Date

27-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5149/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

BHIMRAO BHAGAJI TAYADE DEEPAK D CHOUDHARI AND RAMESH B MORE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS

THE SCHEDULED TRIBES CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE

THE HEAD MASTER RAJASHI SHRI SHAHU VIDYALAYA, PATHRI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

06-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

24-06-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Case Summary: WP/5149/2026 - Bhimrao Bhagaji Tayade v. The State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the petition to 24.06.2026. Interim protection was granted: employers cannot take coercive action against petitioners based on invalidated caste claims, subject to petitioners filing an undertaking within 15 days agreeing not to claim service benefits (promotion, seniority, confirmation, increment, pay fixation) pending the petition's resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5149/2026 - Bhimrao Bhagaji Tayade v. The State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the petition to 24.06.2026. Interim protection was granted: employers cannot take coercive action against petitioners based on invalidated caste claims, subject to petitioners filing an undertaking within 15 days agreeing not to claim service benefits (promotion, seniority, confirmation, increment, pay fixation) pending the petition's resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case