MALLAPPA KALLAPPA DEOMANKAR DIED HIS LRS SUDHIR AND ANR. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANR. — CA/5415/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030168272026
Filing Number
CA/12488/2026
Filing Date
24-04-2026
Registration No
CA/5415/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MALLAPPA KALLAPPA DEOMANKAR DIED HIS LRS SUDHIR AND ANR.
Adv. PATIL LAXMIKANT C.
FULABAI ANANDRAO JEWALI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANR.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION MAJBUTIKARAN DIV. OMERGA
Orders
Summary of CA/5415/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the claimants' cross objections in a land acquisition case for the Benetura medium project in Dharashiv district. The court enhanced compensation from Rs.1,000 per acre (awarded by the Reference Court) to Rs.1,20,000 per acre for irrigated land, applying parity with similarly-situated lands acquired for the same project. The State's appeals were dismissed, and the claimants were granted interest at 9% p.a. for one year and 15% p.a. thereafter, though excluding interest on the delayed condonation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CA/5415/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the claimants' cross objections in a land acquisition case for the Benetura medium project in Dharashiv district. The court enhanced compensation from Rs.1,000 per acre (awarded by the Reference Court) to Rs.1,20,000 per acre for irrigated land, applying parity with similarly-situated lands acquired for the same project. The State's appeals were dismissed, and the claimants were granted interest at 9% p.a. for one year and 15% p.a. thereafter, though excluding interest on the delayed condonation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts