VITTHAL DAVRAO CHOPADE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1650/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030167592026

e-Filing Number

22-04-2026

Filing Number

APPLN/4303/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

APPLN/1650/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VITTHAL DAVRAO CHOPADE AND OTHERS

    Adv. Sonawane Sunita G.

  2. 2.JAYKUMAR RAMNATH CHOPADE

  3. 3.GORAKH SARJERAO PAWAR

  4. 4.RAYBHAN SHASHRAO SHELAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.SUNIL AMBADAS GODE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the criminal application filed by Vitthal Davrao Chopade and others against the State of Maharashtra. The court granted the applicants two weeks to carry out amendments in terms of an earlier order dated 07.03.2026, with a condition that failure to comply would result in the previous order governing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/1650/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the criminal application filed by Vitthal Davrao Chopade and others against the State of Maharashtra. The court granted the applicants two weeks to carry out amendments in terms of an earlier order dated 07.03.2026, with a condition that failure to comply would result in the previous order governing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case