SUNITA RAM MORE SAnTOSH N.PATNE vs THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT STRENGHTING MAJBUTIKARAN DIVISION OMERGA — CA/5245/2026
Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030167002026
e-Filing Number
23-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/12398/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
CA/5245/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNITA RAM MORE SAnTOSH N.PATNE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT STRENGHTING MAJBUTIKARAN DIVISION OMERGA
-
2.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KRISHNA KHORE DEVELOPMENT MAHAMANDAL OMERGA
-
3.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KRISHNA KHORE DEVELOPMENT MAHAMANDAL OMERGA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
Case Summary: CA/5245/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed multiple consolidated applications from agriculturists whose land was acquired in 2004 by the irrigation authority. The court permitted applicants to withdraw 75% of the deposited land acquisition compensation, conditional on filing an undertaking to refund the amount with interest if the pending appeal against the Reference Court's award is decided against them. The court also admitted the underlying first appeals on their merits and disposed of stay applications, as a previous stay order from April 2023 remained in effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/5245/2026
Case Summary: CA/5245/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed multiple consolidated applications from agriculturists whose land was acquired in 2004 by the irrigation authority. The court permitted applicants to withdraw 75% of the deposited land acquisition compensation, conditional on filing an undertaking to refund the amount with interest if the pending appeal against the Reference Court's award is decided against them. The court also admitted the underlying first appeals on their merits and disposed of stay applications, as a previous stay order from April 2023 remained in effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts