LALITA W/O PANDITRAO MANE AND ANR. G K SONTAKKE AND MRS. PRIYANDRA SONTAKKE (PATIL). vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. — CA/5120/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030166012026
Filing Number
CA/12331/2026
Filing Date
23-04-2026
Registration No
CA/5120/2026
Registration Date
28-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LALITA W/O PANDITRAO MANE AND ANR. G K SONTAKKE AND MRS. PRIYANDRA SONTAKKE (PATIL).
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
| 06-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed claimants Lalita W/o Panditrao Mane and others to withdraw 75% of the compensation amount deposited by the Acquiring Body for their acquired house property, on furnishing usual undertaking. The remaining 25% must be deposited in fixed deposits in a nationalized bank pending further orders, maintaining parity with similarly situated claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed claimants Lalita W/o Panditrao Mane and others to withdraw 75% of the compensation amount deposited by the Acquiring Body for their acquired house property, on furnishing usual undertaking. The remaining 25% must be deposited in fixed deposits in a nationalized bank pending further orders, maintaining parity with similarly situated claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts