ASEF KHAN GHULAM RASOOL KHAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/5036/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030165802026

Filing Number

WP/12315/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5036/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASEF KHAN GHULAM RASOOL KHAN

    Adv. JADHAV SATEJ S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

  2. 2.ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIEITES

  3. 3.RECOVERY OFFICER ARDHMAN NAGARI COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.

  4. 4.VARDHMAN NAGARI CO OPERATIVE CERDIT SOCIETY LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGAER

  5. 5.KHAN SADEK GHULAM MAKSUD KHAN

  6. 6.MOHAMMAD SAJJAD KHAN MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN ALI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/5036/2026 The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad permitted petitioner Asef Khan Ghulam Rasool Khan to withdraw his writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others, with liberty to pursue alternative legal remedies. The court kept all contentions open for consideration by the concerned authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5036/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5036/2026 The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad permitted petitioner Asef Khan Ghulam Rasool Khan to withdraw his writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others, with liberty to pursue alternative legal remedies. The court kept all contentions open for consideration by the concerned authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case