SACHIN NARSU CHAUGHULE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/832/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030165562026
Filing Number
BA/4243/2026
Filing Date
23-Apr-2026
Registration No
BA/832/2026
Registration Date
23-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SACHIN NARSU CHAUGHULE
Adv. SHIRSAT SUHAS R
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. P.P. FOR R/SOLE 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Sachin Narsu Chaughule's bail application in a serious case involving charges under IPC Sections 354-A, 354-B, 323, 506 and POCSO Act Sections 8, 12 (involving an 8-year-old victim). The applicant, who had previously breached bail conditions and was subject to a non-bailable warrant, was granted another chance based on his undertaking to attend all trial dates and cooperate with investigations, subject to strict conditions including furnishing contact details to the investigating officer and informing them before leaving his residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
27-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
-
27-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/832/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Sachin Narsu Chaughule's bail application in a serious case involving charges under IPC Sections 354-A, 354-B, 323, 506 and POCSO Act Sections 8, 12 (involving an 8-year-old victim). The applicant, who had previously breached bail conditions and was subject to a non-bailable warrant, was granted another chance based on his undertaking to attend all trial dates and cooperate with investigations, subject to strict conditions including furnishing contact details to the investigating officer and informing them before leaving his residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts