SACHIN NARSU CHAUGHULE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/832/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030165562026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA/4243/2026

Filing Date

23-04-2026

Registration No

BA/832/2026

Registration Date

23-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Indian Penal Code (I.P.C) Section 354,323,504
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCE ACT, 2012 Section 8,12

Petitioner(s)

SACHIN NARSU CHAUGHULE

Adv. SHIRSAT SUHAS R

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Adv. P.P. FOR R/SOLE 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

27-04-2026

REGULAR BAIL- FRESH

08-05-2026
08-06-2026

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Sachin Narsu Chaughule's bail application in a serious case involving charges under IPC Sections 354-A, 354-B, 323, 506 and POCSO Act Sections 8, 12 (involving an 8-year-old victim). The applicant, who had previously breached bail conditions and was subject to a non-bailable warrant, was granted another chance based on his undertaking to attend all trial dates and cooperate with investigations, subject to strict conditions including furnishing contact details to the investigating officer and informing them before leaving his residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Sachin Narsu Chaughule's bail application in a serious case involving charges under IPC Sections 354-A, 354-B, 323, 506 and POCSO Act Sections 8, 12 (involving an 8-year-old victim). The applicant, who had previously breached bail conditions and was subject to a non-bailable warrant, was granted another chance based on his undertaking to attend all trial dates and cooperate with investigations, subject to strict conditions including furnishing contact details to the investigating officer and informing them before leaving his residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case