SATISH ANNASAHEB SHERKAR vs PRAYAGABAI NANSAHEB BHANAGE — CA/5310/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030165442026

Filing Number

CA/12294/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

CA/5310/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATISH ANNASAHEB SHERKAR

    Adv. Gangakhedkar Shailendra S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAYAGABAI NANSAHEB BHANAGE

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRTARY CO OPERATION MARKETING

  3. 3.THE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

  4. 4.THE DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCITIES

  5. 5.THE ASSISTANT REGISTRA CO OPERATIVE SOCIETI

  6. 6.KHOKAR VIVIDH KARYAKARI SEVA SAHAKARI SOCIETY LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Summary of CA 5310/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted ad-interim relief staying the execution of a disqualification order against petitioner Satish Annasaheb Sherkar from his position as Director of a cooperative society. The court directed the Divisional Joint Registrar to expeditiously decide the pending Revision Application within three months, with interim protection remaining in force until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Urgent Orders (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5310/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CA 5310/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted ad-interim relief staying the execution of a disqualification order against petitioner Satish Annasaheb Sherkar from his position as Director of a cooperative society. The court directed the Divisional Joint Registrar to expeditiously decide the pending Revision Application within three months, with interim protection remaining in force until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case