SATISH ANNASAHEB SHERKAR vs MATHURABAI BALASAHEB CHAKRANARAYAN — CA/5313/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030165402026

Filing Number

CA/12291/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

CA/5313/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATISH ANNASAHEB SHERKAR

    Adv. Gangakhedkar Shailendra S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MATHURABAI BALASAHEB CHAKRANARAYAN

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY COOPERATION

  3. 3.THE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

  4. 4.THE DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

  5. 5.THE ASSISTANTNT REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIE

  6. 6.KHOKAR VIVIDH KARYAKARI SEVA SAHAKARI SOCIETY LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted interim relief to Satish Annasaheb Sherkar, staying the execution of a disqualification order removing him as Director of a cooperative society pending revision. The court directed the Divisional Joint Registrar to decide the pending Revision Application within three months, maintaining interim protection until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Urgent Orders (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/5313/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted interim relief to Satish Annasaheb Sherkar, staying the execution of a disqualification order removing him as Director of a cooperative society pending revision. The court directed the Divisional Joint Registrar to decide the pending Revision Application within three months, maintaining interim protection until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case