SHAHADEO DAGADU METE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS — CA/5176/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030165312026
Filing Number
CA/12287/2026
Filing Date
23-Apr-2026
Registration No
CA/5176/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAHADEO DAGADU METE AND OTHERS
Adv. SHINDE CHANDRAKANT K.
-
2.ANANDA DAGADU METE
-
3.MAHADEO DGADU METE
-
4.KAMALBAI RAGHUNATH KHARADE
-
5.NAMABAI SHAMRAO KHARADE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER
-
3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
-
4.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR BEED
-
5.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER PATODA
-
6.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BEED IRRIGATION DIVSION
-
7.THE SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad allowed the applicants' plea to withdraw land acquisition compensation according to their individual entitlements as calculated by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, rather than accepting a composite cheque issued by the state. The court granted the relief sought in prayer clause 'B' of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Urgent Orders (Civil)
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
-
23-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/5176/2026
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad allowed the applicants' plea to withdraw land acquisition compensation according to their individual entitlements as calculated by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, rather than accepting a composite cheque issued by the state. The court granted the relief sought in prayer clause 'B' of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts