GANGADHAR NARSANNA KOTTAWAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRUOGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/5099/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030164542026
Filing Number
WP/12235/2026
Filing Date
23-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/5099/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GANGADHAR NARSANNA KOTTAWAR
Adv. SUNIL MAHADEVAPPA VIBHUTE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRUOGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.THE SCHEDULE TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE KINWAT
-
3.DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER SOCIAL FORESTRY DEPARTMENT
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jul-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
Summary of WP/5099/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 01.07.2026 in the writ petition filed by Gangadhar Narsanna Kottawar against the State of Maharashtra and others. The court directed that respondent No.3 (Divisional Forest Officer) shall not take any coercive action against the petitioner pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5099/2026
Summary of WP/5099/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 01.07.2026 in the writ petition filed by Gangadhar Narsanna Kottawar against the State of Maharashtra and others. The court directed that respondent No.3 (Divisional Forest Officer) shall not take any coercive action against the petitioner pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts