AMOL SITARAM BAGUL AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1586/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030163642026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

APPLN/4159/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

APPLN/1586/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMOL SITARAM BAGUL AND OTHERS

    Adv. SOPAN PARUBA BHADGE

  2. 2.SITARAM SHIVRAM BAGUL

  3. 3.ASHABAI SITARAM BAGUL

  4. 4.MANOJ SITARAM BAGUL

  5. 5.UJWALA MANOJ BAGUL

  6. 6.DIPALI SHESHRAO GAIKWAD

  7. 7.SHESHRAO KASHINATH GAIKWAD

  8. 8.BABASAHEB SUKHDEO MORE

  9. 9.RUPALI BABASAHEB MORE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.RUPALI AMOL BAGUL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the applicants' restoration petition for a quashing application that was previously dismissed for want of prosecution. The court accepted the explanation that the applicant's advocate was unavailable due to his marriage and no notices were issued, granting restoration subject to payment of Rs. 500 costs to the Bar Library. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/1586/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the applicants' restoration petition for a quashing application that was previously dismissed for want of prosecution. The court accepted the explanation that the applicant's advocate was unavailable due to his marriage and no notices were issued, granting restoration subject to payment of Rs. 500 costs to the Bar Library. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case