AMOL SITARAM BAGUL AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1586/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030163642026
e-Filing Number
21-04-2026
Filing Number
APPLN/4159/2026
Filing Date
22-04-2026
Registration No
APPLN/1586/2026
Registration Date
22-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMOL SITARAM BAGUL AND OTHERS
Adv. SOPAN PARUBA BHADGE
SITARAM SHIVRAM BAGUL
ASHABAI SITARAM BAGUL
MANOJ SITARAM BAGUL
UJWALA MANOJ BAGUL
DIPALI SHESHRAO GAIKWAD
SHESHRAO KASHINATH GAIKWAD
BABASAHEB SUKHDEO MORE
RUPALI BABASAHEB MORE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
RUPALI AMOL BAGUL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the applicants' restoration petition for a quashing application that was previously dismissed for want of prosecution. The court accepted the explanation that the applicant's advocate was unavailable due to his marriage and no notices were issued, granting restoration subject to payment of Rs. 500 costs to the Bar Library. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the applicants' restoration petition for a quashing application that was previously dismissed for want of prosecution. The court accepted the explanation that the applicant's advocate was unavailable due to his marriage and no notices were issued, granting restoration subject to payment of Rs. 500 costs to the Bar Library. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts