SADASHIV SHANKAR JADHAV ADV S G DESHMUKH vs USHABAI SADASHIV JADHAV — SA/251/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030163632026

e-Filing Number

17-04-2026

Filing Number

SA/12193/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

SA/251/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SADASHIV SHANKAR JADHAV ADV S G DESHMUKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.USHABAI SADASHIV JADHAV

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Summary of SA/251/2026 In this second appeal before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, Sadashiv Shankar Jadhav challenged the lower courts' judgments regarding his wife Ushabai's suit for marriage expenses of their daughter. The court identified three substantial legal questions involving the wife's locus to file such claims under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act 1956 without the adult daughter as party/plaintiff. The case was adjourned with notice issued to respondents returnable on 25.06.2026, and interim hamdast was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SA/251/2026 In this second appeal before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, Sadashiv Shankar Jadhav challenged the lower courts' judgments regarding his wife Ushabai's suit for marriage expenses of their daughter. The court identified three substantial legal questions involving the wife's locus to file such claims under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act 1956 without the adult daughter as party/plaintiff. The case was adjourned with notice issued to respondents returnable on 25.06.2026, and interim hamdast was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case