AMER PASHA ABDUL QUADAR SAYYED AND OTHERS vs BIBI JAVERIA AMER PASHA SAYYED Advocate - KODALE VIKAS G., KODALE VIKAS G. FOR R/SOLE — WP/552/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030162902026
e-Filing Number
28-03-2026
Filing Number
WP/4137/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/552/2026
Registration Date
22-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMER PASHA ABDUL QUADAR SAYYED AND OTHERS
Adv. Shermale K. N.
-
2.ABDUL QUADAR JANULLA SAYYED
-
3.PARVEEN ABDUL QUADAR SAYYED
-
4.UMAIR PASHA ABDUL QUADAR SAYYED
-
5.FARHA NAAZ UMIAR PASHA SAYYED
-
6.IMRAN HAMED PATHAN
-
7.ASHUFTA IMRAN PATHAN
-
8.SHAISTA SAMEER SHAIKH
-
9.SAMEER NAWAB SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.BIBI JAVERIA AMER PASHA SAYYED Advocate - KODALE VIKAS G., KODALE VIKAS G. FOR R/SOLE
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF
Case Summary: WP/552/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondent Bibi Javeria Amer Pasha Sayyed, returnable on 24.06.2026. The court directed that if petitioners filed an application for exemption from appearance, it shall be decided considering the pendency of the writ petition, noting that earlier proceedings under Section 498-A resulted in FIR quashment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/552/2026
Case Summary: WP/552/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) issued notice to respondent Bibi Javeria Amer Pasha Sayyed, returnable on 24.06.2026. The court directed that if petitioners filed an application for exemption from appearance, it shall be decided considering the pendency of the writ petition, noting that earlier proceedings under Section 498-A resulted in FIR quashment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts