KUNAL SHANKARLAL RELAN vs M/S ABHIRAM ENTERPRISES THROUGH HEMANT SUBHASHCHANDRA AGARWAL — WP/554/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM030162862026

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

WP/4135/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/554/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUNAL SHANKARLAL RELAN

    Adv. BAIG MIRZA MAZHAR JAVED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S ABHIRAM ENTERPRISES THROUGH HEMANT SUBHASHCHANDRA AGARWAL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/554/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the petition filed by Kunal Shankarlal Relan challenging the Appellate Court's suspension of sentence order. The court stayed the 20% compensation deposit condition imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, and instead ordered the petitioner to deposit Rs. 3 Lakhs (10% of compensation) within five weeks, considering his financial hardship from business losses. The interim relief is conditional and will be vacated if the deposit is not made within the stipulated period; the case stands adjourned to 22.6.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/554/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/554/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the petition filed by Kunal Shankarlal Relan challenging the Appellate Court's suspension of sentence order. The court stayed the 20% compensation deposit condition imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, and instead ordered the petitioner to deposit Rs. 3 Lakhs (10% of compensation) within five weeks, considering his financial hardship from business losses. The interim relief is conditional and will be vacated if the deposit is not made within the stipulated period; the case stands adjourned to 22.6.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case