BHATU DILAWAR PINJARI AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/807/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030162702026
Filing Number
BA/4125/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
BA/807/2026
Registration Date
22-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHATU DILAWAR PINJARI AND ANOTHER
Adv. SARIN KARISHMA SANJAY
-
2.NARGIS BHATU PINJARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. P.P. FOR R/SOLE,P.P. FOR R/SOLE 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to Bhatu Dilawar Pinjari and Nargis Bhatu Pinjari in a murder case, finding that the FIR lacked specific allegations against them and the case relied on circumstantial evidence and suspicion. The court noted that while the victim suffered 32 injuries and a knife was recovered, no incriminating material connected the applicants to the crime, and their implication may stem from neighborhood disputes. The applicants were released on bail with conditions including furnishing Rs.30,000 bonds each, weekly reporting to the investigating officer, and restrictions on evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/807/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to Bhatu Dilawar Pinjari and Nargis Bhatu Pinjari in a murder case, finding that the FIR lacked specific allegations against them and the case relied on circumstantial evidence and suspicion. The court noted that while the victim suffered 32 injuries and a knife was recovered, no incriminating material connected the applicants to the crime, and their implication may stem from neighborhood disputes. The applicants were released on bail with conditions including furnishing Rs.30,000 bonds each, weekly reporting to the investigating officer, and restrictions on evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts