RAJRATNA DATTATRAY SHELKE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — APEAL/266/2025
Case under S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14A(2),3(1)(g),(w)(i),(w)(ii),3(1)(r),3(1)(s). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030161722025
e-Filing Number
05-02-2025
Filing Number
APEAL/3824/2025
Filing Date
16-Apr-2025
Registration No
APEAL/266/2025
Registration Date
17-Apr-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJRATNA DATTATRAY SHELKE
Adv. Lone Rajendra M,JADHAV ARVIND GANGADHAR AND Kadam Sanjivani Baliram FOR APPLICANT (CONSENT OBTAINED),JADHAV ARVIND GANGADHAR AND Kadam Sanjivani Baliram FOR APPLICANT (CONSENT OBTAINED), ,JADHAV ARVIND GANGADHAR,Kadam Sanjivani Baliram,JADHAV ARVIND GANGADHAR AND Kadam Sanjivani Baliram FOR APPLICANT (CONSENT OBTAINED)
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. MANTRI SURAJ RAJENDRA FOR R/2 AND 3 1123
-
2.BALAJI GOVINDRAO DESHMUKH
Adv. MANTRI SURAJ RAJENDRA
-
3.VARSHA BALAJI DESHMUKH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the appeal and quashed the pre-arrest bail granted to respondents 2 and 3 in an SC/ST atrocities case, holding that Sections 15-A(3) and (5) of the SC/ST Act are mandatory. The trial court failed to provide notice to the victim/informant or give him an opportunity to be heard before granting bail, violating his statutory rights. The court directed that any future bail application must include hearing the victim beforehand, while extending protection to the accused until April 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Due Admission (Criminal)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
01-Apr-2026
Due Orders Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Due Orders Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
04-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
04-Mar-2026
Due Orders Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
02-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Due Orders Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
16-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
16-Jan-2026
Due Admission (Criminal)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
09-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Due Admission (Criminal)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
-
12-Dec-2025
Due Admission (Criminal)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
-
28-Nov-2025
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
-
07-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF
-
07-Nov-2025
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
-
10-Oct-2025
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
-
03-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF
-
03-Oct-2025
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
-
25-Sep-2025
Urgent Circulation (Criminal Appeals)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
04-Sep-2025
Urgent Circulation (Criminal Appeals)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
14-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
14-Aug-2025
Due Order Await Service Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
24-Jul-2025
For Admission - Fresh Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
03-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
03-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. APEAL/266/2025
Case Summary The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the appeal and quashed the pre-arrest bail granted to respondents 2 and 3 in an SC/ST atrocities case, holding that Sections 15-A(3) and (5) of the SC/ST Act are mandatory. The trial court failed to provide notice to the victim/informant or give him an opportunity to be heard before granting bail, violating his statutory rights. The court directed that any future bail application must include hearing the victim beforehand, while extending protection to the accused until April 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts