SANDIP PREMSINGH RAJPUT (JAMADAR) vs THE REGISTRAR OF MONEY LENDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DHULE — WP/5161/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030160512026

Filing Number

WP/11980/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5161/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDIP PREMSINGH RAJPUT (JAMADAR)

    Adv. PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE REGISTRAR OF MONEY LENDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DHULE

  2. 2.SMT. SARLABAI AJITSINGH RAJPUT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed petitioner Sandip Premsingh Rajput's writ petitions challenging "no cross" orders passed by the Money Lending Registrar. The court quashed the orders and remanded the case for cross-examination, ruling that while a power of attorney holder's evidence is admissible if they have personal knowledge of the transaction, the petitioner cannot be denied his right to cross-examine witnesses in the underlying Savkari money-lending dispute case. The court directed completion within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5161/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed petitioner Sandip Premsingh Rajput's writ petitions challenging "no cross" orders passed by the Money Lending Registrar. The court quashed the orders and remanded the case for cross-examination, ruling that while a power of attorney holder's evidence is admissible if they have personal knowledge of the transaction, the petitioner cannot be denied his right to cross-examine witnesses in the underlying Savkari money-lending dispute case. The court directed completion within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case