VIJAY HARIBHAU KAKADE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR ALNA — CA/5360/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030159332026
e-Filing Number
17-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/11889/2026
Filing Date
20-Apr-2026
Registration No
CA/5360/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY HARIBHAU KAKADE
Adv. BHISE VITTHAL DNYANOBA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR ALNA
-
2.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER
-
3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINER MINOR IRRIGATION WORK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed Vijay Haribhau Kakade's civil application seeking withdrawal of compensation deposited by the acquiring body in a land acquisition matter. The court permitted withdrawal of 80% of the deposited amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar, while directing the remaining 20% be invested in a nationalized bank, based on the enhanced compensation being slightly above four times the original valuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
At 2.30 Pm CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
20-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/5360/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed Vijay Haribhau Kakade's civil application seeking withdrawal of compensation deposited by the acquiring body in a land acquisition matter. The court permitted withdrawal of 80% of the deposited amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar, while directing the remaining 20% be invested in a nationalized bank, based on the enhanced compensation being slightly above four times the original valuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts