SUNDAR TOLA RATHOD DIED THR LR SOPAN SUNDAR RATHOD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/5279/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.

CNR: HCBM030157882025

Next Hearing

30th July 2026

Filing Number

WP/12051/2025

Filing Date

15-04-2025

Registration No

WP/5279/2025

Registration Date

21-04-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet

Petitioner(s)

SUNDAR TOLA RATHOD DIED THR LR SOPAN SUNDAR RATHOD

Adv. SHINGNAPURE RAVINDRA K

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Adv. PULKUNDWAR SANTOSH BABURAO FOR R/8,AGP WAIVES FOR R.NO 1 TO 3 1123

DISTRICT COLLECTOR JALNA

THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER JALNA

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV

30-07-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

18-09-2025

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

15-07-2025

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI,HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV

Case Summary: WP/5279/2025 The case was adjourned to 30.07.2026. The petitioner's advocate was directed to remove office objections within six weeks, while respondents were granted eight weeks as a final opportunity to file an affidavit-in-reply, with respondent No. 3 required to personally appear and produce relevant records and the Inward Register on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5279/2025 The case was adjourned to 30.07.2026. The petitioner's advocate was directed to remove office objections within six weeks, while respondents were granted eight weeks as a final opportunity to file an affidavit-in-reply, with respondent No. 3 required to personally appear and produce relevant records and the Inward Register on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case