SHILA W/O. SHRIDHAR METE AND ORS. vs DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, M.S.R.T.C., PARBHANI DIVISION, PARBHANI. — CA/5218/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030157302026
Filing Number
CA/11739/2026
Filing Date
18-04-2026
Registration No
CA/5218/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHILA W/O. SHRIDHAR METE AND ORS.
Adv. Suryawanshi Surendra V.
Respondent(s)
DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, M.S.R.T.C., PARBHANI DIVISION, PARBHANI.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the civil application, permitting applicant Sakshi Shridhar Mete to receive Rs. 4,00,000 from court-deposited funds for her wedding expenses. The court found her need justified and noted she had been excluded from earlier disbursals (2019) as she was a minor at that time, while other applicants received proportionate amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the civil application, permitting applicant Sakshi Shridhar Mete to receive Rs. 4,00,000 from court-deposited funds for her wedding expenses. The court found her need justified and noted she had been excluded from earlier disbursals (2019) as she was a minor at that time, while other applicants received proportionate amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts