SHILA W/O. SHRIDHAR METE AND ORS. vs DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, M.S.R.T.C., PARBHANI DIVISION, PARBHANI. — CA/5218/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030157302026
Filing Number
CA/11739/2026
Filing Date
18-Apr-2026
Registration No
CA/5218/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHILA W/O. SHRIDHAR METE AND ORS.
Adv. Suryawanshi Surendra V.
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, M.S.R.T.C., PARBHANI DIVISION, PARBHANI.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the civil application, permitting applicant Sakshi Shridhar Mete to receive Rs. 4,00,000 from court-deposited funds for her wedding expenses. The court found her need justified and noted she had been excluded from earlier disbursals (2019) as she was a minor at that time, while other applicants received proportionate amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
At 2.30 Pm CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
18-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/5218/2026
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the civil application, permitting applicant Sakshi Shridhar Mete to receive Rs. 4,00,000 from court-deposited funds for her wedding expenses. The court found her need justified and noted she had been excluded from earlier disbursals (2019) as she was a minor at that time, while other applicants received proportionate amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts