Sajeed Razzak Patel U/G Razzak Yakub Patel vs The State of Maharashtra — CA/4605/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 24th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030155462026
e-Filing Number
16-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/11632/2026
Filing Date
17-04-2026
Registration No
CA/4605/2026
Registration Date
18-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sajeed Razzak Patel U/G Razzak Yakub Patel
Adv. SHINDE MANOJ DHARMARAJ
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra
The Special Land Acquisition Officer
The Executive Engineer
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CA 4605/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed Sajeed Razzak Patel's application for withdrawal of Rs. 9,55,515/- compensation deposited by the land acquiring body in a land acquisition matter. The court permitted withdrawal of 75% of the amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial), with the remaining 25% to be invested in a nationalized bank. Additionally, the court condoned a 579-day delay in preferring the appeal, finding no mala fides, and disposed of the civil application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CA 4605/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed Sajeed Razzak Patel's application for withdrawal of Rs. 9,55,515/- compensation deposited by the land acquiring body in a land acquisition matter. The court permitted withdrawal of 75% of the amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial), with the remaining 25% to be invested in a nationalized bank. Additionally, the court condoned a 579-day delay in preferring the appeal, finding no mala fides, and disposed of the civil application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts