HARUBAI MAHADEV AABNAVE DIED THROUGH HIS LRS SUBHASH MAHADEV AABNAVE AND OTHERS vs NANA KACHRU DAUD DIED THROUGH LIS LRS ANUSAYA NANASAHEB DAUND AND OTHERS — WP/4905/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030153652025
Filing Number
WP/11709/2025
Filing Date
09-Apr-2025
Registration No
WP/4905/2025
Registration Date
09-Apr-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARUBAI MAHADEV AABNAVE DIED THROUGH HIS LRS SUBHASH MAHADEV AABNAVE AND OTHERS
Adv. KHANDE AVINASH A.
-
2.RAJENDRA JAGANNATH AABNAVE
-
3.BHAUSAHEB JAGANNATH AABNAVE
-
4.NITIN JAGANNATH AABNAVE
-
5.KESHAV MARUTI AABNAVE
-
6.VATSALABAI BHARAT KAMBLE
Respondent(s)
-
1.NANA KACHRU DAUD DIED THROUGH LIS LRS ANUSAYA NANASAHEB DAUND AND OTHERS
-
2.BHARTI VINOD KAMBLE
-
3.VIJAY MARUTI AABNAVE DIED THR LRS VIDYATAI VIJAY AABNAVE
-
4.HIRABAI VIJAYRAO WANKHEDKAR
-
5.TARABAI CHANDRAKANT PACHORE
-
6.RANJANA VILAS JATKAR
-
7.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AHILYANAGAR
-
8.THE TAHSILDAR KOPARGAON
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
Summary of WP 4905/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition challenging the decline of a stay application before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. The petitioners' revision petition was dismissed for want of prosecution after their advocate was absent on two consecutive hearing dates (23.9.2024 and 27.9.2024). The court directed the Revenue Tribunal to decide the petitioners' restoration application on merits within 8 weeks, and maintained interim relief pending that decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Urgent Circulation - CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
22-Apr-2026
For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
07-Apr-2026
Urgent Circulation - CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Urgent Circulation - CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
23-Feb-2026
For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
09-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
01-Oct-2025
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
14-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
14-Aug-2025
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
02-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
02-Jul-2025
Urgent Circulation - CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
18-Jun-2025
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
11-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
11-Jun-2025
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
23-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
23-Apr-2025
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
09-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
09-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4905/2025
Summary of WP 4905/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition challenging the decline of a stay application before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. The petitioners' revision petition was dismissed for want of prosecution after their advocate was absent on two consecutive hearing dates (23.9.2024 and 27.9.2024). The court directed the Revenue Tribunal to decide the petitioners' restoration application on merits within 8 weeks, and maintained interim relief pending that decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts