SANDEEP NANASAHEB PAWAR AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — ABA/644/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030152842026

Filing Number

ABA/3831/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

ABA/644/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118,115,352,351,189,190,191
Arms Act Section 4,25
Maharashtra Police Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP NANASAHEB PAWAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. NAGARGOJE ANKUSH NIVRUTTI

  2. 2.SANGRAM PRAKASH PAWAR

  3. 3.MANGESH BABASAHEB BHOSALE

  4. 4.PRAKASH KISANRAO PAWAR

  5. 5.RITESH RAMESH PAWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. P.P. FOR R/1 AND R/2 1123

  2. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Case Summary: ABA/644/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to five applicants (Sandeep Nanasaheb Pawar, Sangram Prakash Pawar, Mangesh Babasaheb Bhosale, Prakash Kisanrao Pawar, and Ritesh Ramesh Pawar) in a group assault case involving rival factions. While the FIR specifically attributed particular acts to other co-accused, the applicants were charged only with general participation in an unlawful assembly. The court found that the applicants—with no criminal antecedents and merely present at a hospital—were likely falsely implicated for vengeful purposes, and granted bail on conditions including Rs. 50,000 bonds, police reporting, and restrictions on entering the crime scene's police jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/644/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/644/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to five applicants (Sandeep Nanasaheb Pawar, Sangram Prakash Pawar, Mangesh Babasaheb Bhosale, Prakash Kisanrao Pawar, and Ritesh Ramesh Pawar) in a group assault case involving rival factions. While the FIR specifically attributed particular acts to other co-accused, the applicants were charged only with general participation in an unlawful assembly. The court found that the applicants—with no criminal antecedents and merely present at a hospital—were likely falsely implicated for vengeful purposes, and granted bail on conditions including Rs. 50,000 bonds, police reporting, and restrictions on entering the crime scene's police jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case