SANDEEP NANASAHEB PAWAR AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — ABA/644/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030152842026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

ABA/3831/2026

Filing Date

16-04-2026

Registration No

ABA/644/2026

Registration Date

16-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118,115,352,351,189,190,191
Arms Act Section 4,25
Maharashtra Police Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

SANDEEP NANASAHEB PAWAR AND OTHERS

Adv. NAGARGOJE ANKUSH NIVRUTTI

SANGRAM PRAKASH PAWAR

MANGESH BABASAHEB BHOSALE

PRAKASH KISANRAO PAWAR

RITESH RAMESH PAWAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Adv. P.P. FOR R/1 AND R/2 1123

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

21-04-2026

ANTICIPATORY BAIL - FIRST TIME

04-05-2026

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Case Summary: ABA/644/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to five applicants (Sandeep Nanasaheb Pawar, Sangram Prakash Pawar, Mangesh Babasaheb Bhosale, Prakash Kisanrao Pawar, and Ritesh Ramesh Pawar) in a group assault case involving rival factions. While the FIR specifically attributed particular acts to other co-accused, the applicants were charged only with general participation in an unlawful assembly. The court found that the applicants—with no criminal antecedents and merely present at a hospital—were likely falsely implicated for vengeful purposes, and granted bail on conditions including Rs. 50,000 bonds, police reporting, and restrictions on entering the crime scene's police jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/644/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to five applicants (Sandeep Nanasaheb Pawar, Sangram Prakash Pawar, Mangesh Babasaheb Bhosale, Prakash Kisanrao Pawar, and Ritesh Ramesh Pawar) in a group assault case involving rival factions. While the FIR specifically attributed particular acts to other co-accused, the applicants were charged only with general participation in an unlawful assembly. The court found that the applicants—with no criminal antecedents and merely present at a hospital—were likely falsely implicated for vengeful purposes, and granted bail on conditions including Rs. 50,000 bonds, police reporting, and restrictions on entering the crime scene's police jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case