SANKET BABASAHEB TARDE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/750/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030152592026
Filing Number
BA/3818/2026
Filing Date
16-Apr-2026
Registration No
BA/750/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANKET BABASAHEB TARDE
Adv. Rahul R. Karpe
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. P.P. FOR R/SOLE 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
Case Summary: BA/750/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to Sanket Babasaheb Tarde, accused of assaulting an informant with a scythe during a November 2025 incident. The court found insufficient evidence to conclusively attribute specific injuries to the applicant, noting the rivalry existed between the informant and a co-accused, not the applicant, and that the applicant's injuries to non-vital body parts could not be solely attributed to him. Released on ₹40,000 bail with conditions including non-tampering with evidence and surrender of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/750/2026
Case Summary: BA/750/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to Sanket Babasaheb Tarde, accused of assaulting an informant with a scythe during a November 2025 incident. The court found insufficient evidence to conclusively attribute specific injuries to the applicant, noting the rivalry existed between the informant and a co-accused, not the applicant, and that the applicant's injuries to non-vital body parts could not be solely attributed to him. Released on ₹40,000 bail with conditions including non-tampering with evidence and surrender of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts