SANKET BABASAHEB TARDE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/750/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030152592026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA/3818/2026

Filing Date

16-04-2026

Registration No

BA/750/2026

Registration Date

16-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,119,118,189,190,191,49
Arms Act Section 4,25

Petitioner(s)

SANKET BABASAHEB TARDE

Adv. Rahul R. Karpe

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Adv. P.P. FOR R/SOLE 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

20-04-2026

REGULAR BAIL- FRESH

06-05-2026

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

Case Summary: BA/750/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to Sanket Babasaheb Tarde, accused of assaulting an informant with a scythe during a November 2025 incident. The court found insufficient evidence to conclusively attribute specific injuries to the applicant, noting the rivalry existed between the informant and a co-accused, not the applicant, and that the applicant's injuries to non-vital body parts could not be solely attributed to him. Released on ₹40,000 bail with conditions including non-tampering with evidence and surrender of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA/750/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to Sanket Babasaheb Tarde, accused of assaulting an informant with a scythe during a November 2025 incident. The court found insufficient evidence to conclusively attribute specific injuries to the applicant, noting the rivalry existed between the informant and a co-accused, not the applicant, and that the applicant's injuries to non-vital body parts could not be solely attributed to him. Released on ₹40,000 bail with conditions including non-tampering with evidence and surrender of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case