RAMPRASAD ARJUN PAWAR AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — BA/747/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030152072026
Filing Number
BA/3802/2026
Filing Date
16-Apr-2026
Registration No
BA/747/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMPRASAD ARJUN PAWAR AND ANOTHER
Adv. SHEKADE SHASHIKANT E
-
2.ASHOK RAMPRASAD PAWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. P.P. FOR R/1 AND R/2 1123
-
2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
Case Summary: The Aurangabad High Court granted bail to Ramprasad Arjun Pawar and Ashok Ramprasad Pawar, charged with knife assault under BNS 2023 sections 3(5), 351(3), 351(2), 115(2), and 109. The court found absence of mens rea, no clear motive for the alleged November 2025 assault, and no criminal antecedents, despite prosecution evidence of weapon recovery and injury corroboration. Both applicants were released on Rs. 50,000 personal recognizance bonds each with standard conditions including non-tampering with evidence and geographic restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
06-May-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/747/2026
Case Summary: The Aurangabad High Court granted bail to Ramprasad Arjun Pawar and Ashok Ramprasad Pawar, charged with knife assault under BNS 2023 sections 3(5), 351(3), 351(2), 115(2), and 109. The court found absence of mens rea, no clear motive for the alleged November 2025 assault, and no criminal antecedents, despite prosecution evidence of weapon recovery and injury corroboration. Both applicants were released on Rs. 50,000 personal recognizance bonds each with standard conditions including non-tampering with evidence and geographic restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts