ASIF KHAN NAWAB KHAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1403/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030151492026
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
15-04-2026
Filing Number
APPLN/3782/2026
Filing Date
16-04-2026
Registration No
APPLN/1403/2026
Registration Date
16-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASIF KHAN NAWAB KHAN
Adv. RAMEEZ M. SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. P.P. FOR R/1,KULKARNI RASHMI S.,KULKARNI RASHMI S. FOR R/2 (APPOINTED) 1123
XYZ
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
URGENT CIRCULATION-CRIMINAL
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
| 18-06-2026 | URGENT CIRCULATION-CRIMINAL |
| 05-05-2026 | |
| 29-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: APPLN/1403/2026 Asif Khan Nawab Khan v. The State of Maharashtra The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case to 18th June 2026 and granted interim relief to the applicant. The court stayed the operation of the trial court's bail cancellation order and suspended the non-bailable warrant pending final disposal, finding that bail cancellation based solely on a non-cognizable complaint lacks concrete evidence. The applicant was directed not to threaten the complainant or victim, with any violation to be considered at final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: APPLN/1403/2026 Asif Khan Nawab Khan v. The State of Maharashtra The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case to 18th June 2026 and granted interim relief to the applicant. The court stayed the operation of the trial court's bail cancellation order and suspended the non-bailable warrant pending final disposal, finding that bail cancellation based solely on a non-cognizable complaint lacks concrete evidence. The applicant was directed not to threaten the complainant or victim, with any violation to be considered at final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts