NARESH RUPALA CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS vs THE STATES OF MAHARASHTRA — WP/503/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030150822026
e-Filing Number
15-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/3769/2026
Filing Date
16-04-2026
Registration No
WP/503/2026
Registration Date
16-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Withdrawn
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NARESH RUPALA CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS
Adv. Deshpande Priyanka Ashok
Chandrakant Madhukar Sonar
Anup Omprakash Agrawal
Bhagwan Shankar Gawali
Pradip Balasaheb Karpe
Bhikan Madhukar Varade
Devendra Chandrakant Sonar
Prashant Sonaji Bagul
Rohit Bhanudas Chandode
Dinesh Yashwant Bagul
Omprakash Gopalkrishna Khandelwal
Amol (Pappu) Babanrao Dhapse
Harshkumar Radhyesham Relan
Vikky Mahadev Pardeshi
Vikram alias Chhotu Fakira Thorat
Chetan Prakashchand Mandore
Amol Laxman Suryawanshi
Rahul Suryakant Targe
Nagsen Damodar Borse
Respondent(s)
THE STATES OF MAHARASHTRA
Orders
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition challenging a trial court order regarding the accused's objections to suggestions made by the APP to prosecution witnesses. The court found the trial court's order merely deferred consideration of the application until judgment pronouncement, making it not immediately appealable, but clarified the objection would be considered on merits during final trial arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition challenging a trial court order regarding the accused's objections to suggestions made by the APP to prosecution witnesses. The court found the trial court's order merely deferred consideration of the application until judgment pronouncement, making it not immediately appealable, but clarified the objection would be considered on merits during final trial arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts