NARESH RUPALA CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS vs THE STATES OF MAHARASHTRA — WP/503/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030150822026

e-Filing Number

15-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/3769/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/503/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Withdrawn

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 353,332,337,143,147,148,149
Maharashtra Police Act Section 137(1)(3),135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARESH RUPALA CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS

    Adv. Deshpande Priyanka Ashok

  2. 2.Chandrakant Madhukar Sonar

  3. 3.Anup Omprakash Agrawal

  4. 4.Bhagwan Shankar Gawali

  5. 5.Pradip Balasaheb Karpe

  6. 6.Bhikan Madhukar Varade

  7. 7.Devendra Chandrakant Sonar

  8. 8.Prashant Sonaji Bagul

  9. 9.Rohit Bhanudas Chandode

  10. 10.Dinesh Yashwant Bagul

  11. 11.Omprakash Gopalkrishna Khandelwal

  12. 12.Amol (Pappu) Babanrao Dhapse

  13. 13.Harshkumar Radhyesham Relan

  14. 14.Vikky Mahadev Pardeshi

  15. 15.Vikram alias Chhotu Fakira Thorat

  16. 16.Chetan Prakashchand Mandore

  17. 17.Amol Laxman Suryawanshi

  18. 18.Rahul Suryakant Targe

  19. 19.Nagsen Damodar Borse

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATES OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition challenging a trial court order regarding the accused's objections to suggestions made by the APP to prosecution witnesses. The court found the trial court's order merely deferred consideration of the application until judgment pronouncement, making it not immediately appealable, but clarified the objection would be considered on merits during final trial arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/503/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition challenging a trial court order regarding the accused's objections to suggestions made by the APP to prosecution witnesses. The court found the trial court's order merely deferred consideration of the application until judgment pronouncement, making it not immediately appealable, but clarified the objection would be considered on merits during final trial arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case