Subhash So Dattatraya Devkar ADV RAJENDRA K TEMKAR vs The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division at Osmanabad — CA/5265/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 54. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030149172026
e-Filing Number
15-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/11182/2026
Filing Date
15-Apr-2026
Registration No
CA/5265/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Subhash So Dattatraya Devkar ADV RAJENDRA K TEMKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division at Osmanabad
-
2.The State of Maharashtra, Through the Collector
-
3.The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Krishna Khore Vikas Mahamandal, Osmanabad
-
4.Shivaji S/o Dattatraya Devkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the civil applications, permitting the applicants to withdraw 80% of Rs. 1,14,81,516/- deposited by the acquiring body in a land acquisition matter, with accrued interest to be divided equally between them upon furnishing separate undertakings. The remaining 20% balance was ordered to be invested in a nationalized bank, and notice was issued to the deceased's legal heirs, returnable on 14.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/5265/2026
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the civil applications, permitting the applicants to withdraw 80% of Rs. 1,14,81,516/- deposited by the acquiring body in a land acquisition matter, with accrued interest to be divided equally between them upon furnishing separate undertakings. The remaining 20% balance was ordered to be invested in a nationalized bank, and notice was issued to the deceased's legal heirs, returnable on 14.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts