Subhash So Dattatraya Devkar ADV RAJENDRA K TEMKAR vs The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division at Osmanabad — CA/5265/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 54. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030149172026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

15-04-2026

Filing Number

CA/11182/2026

Filing Date

15-04-2026

Registration No

CA/5265/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 54

Petitioner(s)

Subhash So Dattatraya Devkar ADV RAJENDRA K TEMKAR

Respondent(s)

The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division at Osmanabad

The State of Maharashtra, Through the Collector

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Krishna Khore Vikas Mahamandal, Osmanabad

Shivaji S/o Dattatraya Devkar

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the civil applications, permitting the applicants to withdraw 80% of Rs. 1,14,81,516/- deposited by the acquiring body in a land acquisition matter, with accrued interest to be divided equally between them upon furnishing separate undertakings. The remaining 20% balance was ordered to be invested in a nationalized bank, and notice was issued to the deceased's legal heirs, returnable on 14.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the civil applications, permitting the applicants to withdraw 80% of Rs. 1,14,81,516/- deposited by the acquiring body in a land acquisition matter, with accrued interest to be divided equally between them upon furnishing separate undertakings. The remaining 20% balance was ordered to be invested in a nationalized bank, and notice was issued to the deceased's legal heirs, returnable on 14.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case