TANAJI WAMANRAO DESALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/727/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030149072026

Filing Number

BA/3720/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA/727/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,115,352,351,3(5)
Arms Act Section 4,25
Maharashtra Police Act Section 37(1)(C),135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TANAJI WAMANRAO DESALE

    Adv. Pawar Rahul S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. P.P. FOR R/SOLE 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad) allowed Tanaji Wamanrao Desale's bail application in a case involving sword assault charges stemming from political rivalry during cooperative society elections. The court found the injuries were simple and non-vital, and granted bail with a ₹40,000 personal recognizance bond plus a solvent surety, imposing conditions including staying away from the village and not tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/727/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad) allowed Tanaji Wamanrao Desale's bail application in a case involving sword assault charges stemming from political rivalry during cooperative society elections. The court found the injuries were simple and non-vital, and granted bail with a ₹40,000 personal recognizance bond plus a solvent surety, imposing conditions including staying away from the village and not tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case