LAKHAN AABASAHEB SURASHE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — BA/722/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: --APPLICATION ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030148882026
Filing Number
BA/3712/2026
Filing Date
15-04-2026
Registration No
BA/722/2026
Registration Date
15-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LAKHAN AABASAHEB SURASHE
Adv. Abhaysinh K. Bhosle
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. Pawar Amol Ajay FOR R/2 1123
XYZ
Adv. Pawar Amol Ajay
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)
DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL) |
| 30-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL) |
Orders
The High Court at Aurangabad granted bail to Lakhan Aabasaheb Surashe and co-applicant Dheeraj Rameshwar Gavhane, accused of rape and POCSO Act violations involving a minor victim (17.11 years old). The court found the victim's statements and conduct lacked credibility, noting the medical certificate showed no clear force indicators and that the alleged assault appeared consensual rather than forcible. Both applicants were released on Rs. 40,000 personal recognizance bonds with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court at Aurangabad granted bail to Lakhan Aabasaheb Surashe and co-applicant Dheeraj Rameshwar Gavhane, accused of rape and POCSO Act violations involving a minor victim (17.11 years old). The court found the victim's statements and conduct lacked credibility, noting the medical certificate showed no clear force indicators and that the alleged assault appeared consensual rather than forcible. Both applicants were released on Rs. 40,000 personal recognizance bonds with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts