MAHARASHTRA AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD THROUGH MANAGER PRALHAD RAMRAO PHAD vs VENKATESH AGENCY THROUGH PROPRIETOR, KALPANA DNYASHEWAR @ SANJAY HARALE — ALP/18/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 419(4). Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030147992026

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

e-Filing Number

14-03-2026

Filing Number

ALP/3692/2026

Filing Date

15-04-2026

Registration No

ALP/18/2026

Registration Date

15-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 419(4)
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

MAHARASHTRA AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD THROUGH MANAGER PRALHAD RAMRAO PHAD

Adv. ANIL PRAKASHRAO PIRATWAD

Respondent(s)

VENKATESH AGENCY THROUGH PROPRIETOR, KALPANA DNYASHEWAR @ SANJAY HARALE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE

17-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

08-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE

In case ALP/18/2026 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench), Maharashtra Agro Industries Development Corporation Ltd filed an application for leave to appeal against Venkatesh Agency. The court issued notice to the respondent on April 17, 2026, with the matter returnable on June 8, 2026, for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In case ALP/18/2026 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench), Maharashtra Agro Industries Development Corporation Ltd filed an application for leave to appeal against Venkatesh Agency. The court issued notice to the respondent on April 17, 2026, with the matter returnable on June 8, 2026, for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case