SANT BHAGWANBABA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL ANSURDA AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/3924/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14, 19, 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030147032026
Filing Number
WP/11024/2026
Filing Date
15-04-2026
Registration No
WP/3924/2026
Registration Date
15-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANT BHAGWANBABA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL ANSURDA AND ORS
Adv. POKALE DNYANESHWAR BHAURAO
ASTITVA SAMAJIK SANSTHA GOUDGAON
NAVRANG SAMAJSEVA MANDAL SOLAPUR SANCHALIT SCHOOL
SHRI DARLING SHKSHAN SANSTHA CHINCHWADE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS
THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT GOVE. OF MAHARASHTRA
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DIRECTORATE OF PRIMARY EDUCATION
THE EDUCATION OFFICER PRIMARY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of seven writ petitions filed by private educational institutions seeking fee reimbursement for 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The court directed respondents to independently scrutinize each petitioner's proposal on merit and decide within four weeks; if entitled, reimbursement must be disbursed within four additional weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of seven writ petitions filed by private educational institutions seeking fee reimbursement for 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The court directed respondents to independently scrutinize each petitioner's proposal on merit and decide within four weeks; if entitled, reimbursement must be disbursed within four additional weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts