SUMERU SAMAJIK SEVABHAVI BAHUUDDESHIYA SANSTHA ANDUR AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETORY AND ORS — WP/3920/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14, 19 AND 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030146972026
Filing Number
WP/11018/2026
Filing Date
15-04-2026
Registration No
WP/3920/2026
Registration Date
15-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUMERU SAMAJIK SEVABHAVI BAHUUDDESHIYA SANSTHA ANDUR AND ORS
Adv. POKALE DNYANESHWAR BHAURAO
PRERNA BAHUUDESHIYA SEVABHAVI SAMAJIK SANSTHA ANDUR
RAJASTHANI BAHUUDDESHIYA SANSTHA DHARASHIV SANCHALIT SCHOOL
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETORY AND ORS
THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECR.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DIRECTORATE OF PRIMARY EDUCATION
THE EDUCATION OFFICER PARIMARY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of seven writ petitions filed by private schools seeking reimbursement of fees for 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The court directed respondents to independently scrutinize each school's proposal on merit and decide within four weeks; if entitled, disbursement must follow within another four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of seven writ petitions filed by private schools seeking reimbursement of fees for 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The court directed respondents to independently scrutinize each school's proposal on merit and decide within four weeks; if entitled, disbursement must follow within another four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts