SOMNATH NARHARI VYAVHARE AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ANR — WP/3927/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030146912026
Filing Number
WP/11013/2026
Filing Date
15-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/3927/2026
Registration Date
15-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOMNATH NARHARI VYAVHARE AND ANR
Adv. BHOSALE MAHESH S.
-
2.PRADIP NAMDEORAO MASKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ANR
-
2.MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jul-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF
Summary The writ petition was admitted with ad-interim relief granted. The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed respondents to accept applications from petitioners filed on or before 17.04.2026 for examination as per the 18.03.2026 Advertisement. The case is returnable on 08.07.2026 and will be heard jointly with Writ Petition No. 3840/2026, with the ad-interim order remaining subject to final outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3927/2026
Summary The writ petition was admitted with ad-interim relief granted. The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed respondents to accept applications from petitioners filed on or before 17.04.2026 for examination as per the 18.03.2026 Advertisement. The case is returnable on 08.07.2026 and will be heard jointly with Writ Petition No. 3840/2026, with the ad-interim order remaining subject to final outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts